<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
 <title>kaisernetwork.org: Health Policy Daily Report</title>
 <link>http://www.kaisernetwork.org/</link>
 <description>Kaisernetwork Daily Reports RSS Feed</description>
 <language>en-us</language>
 <copyright>kaisernetwork.org is a free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.</copyright>
 <managingEditor>info@kaisernetwork.org</managingEditor>
 <pubDate>Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:13:35 EST</pubDate>
 


 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Sen. Kennedy Circulates Draft of Health Reform Legislation]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58639</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://help.senate.gov/" target="_new">Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee</a> Chair Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) is circulating an outline of health care overhaul legislation that includes a requirement that all individuals obtain coverage and requires contributions from employers, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/28/AR2009052803772.html?hpid=sec-health" target="_new"><cite>Washington Post</cite></a> reports. According to the <cite>Post</cite>, the legislation "closely resembles" the Massachusetts health insurance law enacted in 2006, the <i>Post</i> reports. According to the draft summary, the bill calls for a public, government-sponsored health insurance option that would compete with private insurers. The measure also would expand Medicaid eligibility, according to the <i>Post</i>. Kennedy spokesperson Anthony Coley said that the outline is not yet finalized. He said, "We are still actively negotiating with members" of the Senate HELP Committee. <BR><BR>According to a top White House official, Kennedy is expected to introduce his measure on Monday. A timetable released by Kennedy's office calls for Senate HELP Committee Democrats to meet June 2 (Connolly, <cite>Washington Post</cite>, 5/29). A bipartisan walk-through of Kennedy's bill is scheduled for June 5 and June 9. Hearings on the bill would then take place on June 10 or June 11. The mark up of the bill is scheduled from June 16 through June 25 (Bogardus, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/markup-for-healthcare-reform-slated-for-mid-june-2009-05-28.html" target="_new"><cite>The Hill</cite></a>, 5/28). If Kennedy holds to the schedule, he will be ahead of other congressional Democrats, including <a href="http://www.senate.gov/~finance/" target="_new">Senate Finance Committee</a> Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.), on proposing overhaul legislation (<cite>Washington Post</cite>, 5/29). Coley said, "These are target dates that are not set in stone." Although Senate Democrats are hoping to pass health care reform legislation before the August recess, several senators have questioned whether that timeline is feasible (<cite>The Hill</cite>, 5/28).
<p><b>
Reform Supporters Call For Removal of Ad
</b><br>
In related health reform news, <a href="http://www.democracyforamerica.com/" target="_new">Democracy for America</a> and the <a href="http://www.seiu.org/" target="_new">Service Employees International Union</a> on Thursday demanded that Washington, D.C.'s <a href="http://www.nbc.com/" target="_new">NBC</a> television affiliate refuse to air a 30-minute <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58626" target="_new">infomercial</a> funded by <a href="http://www.conservativesforpatientsrights.com/" target="_new">Conservatives for Patients' Rights</a>, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/23065.html" target="_new"><cite>Politico</cite></a> reports. <BR><BR>According to a letter from SEIU to <a href="http://www.nbcwashington.com/" target="_new">NBC4</a>, the ad, scheduled to run after "<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/" target="_new">Meet the Press</a>" on Sunday, "will be false, deceitful and a distortion." The union added that the station has a responsibility to pull the ad because it has a duty to protect the public from misleading advertising. In the letter, the union wrote that the conservative group has a history of running "demonstrably false" ads. According to Levana Layendecker, the online campaigns director for <a href="http://www.healthcareforamericanow.org/" target="_new">Health Care for America Now</a>, CPR could face fines from the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/" target="_new">Federal Communications Commission</a> if the ad is run, adding that it contains false statements. <BR><BR>CPR spokesperson Keith Appell said, "It's no surprise that they would try to block the public from seeing any information about the dangers of government-run health care," adding, "This program is full of compelling first-person accounts that every American should hear." He said that CPR stands by its ad. An NBC network spokesperson would not comment on the infomercial or the request, deferring questions to NBC4. The affiliate's general manger, Michael Jack, did not return a request for comment (Frates, <cite>Politico</cite>, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Obama Says Health Reform Must Be Done This Year]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58640</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The opportunity to enact health care reform legislation could be missed unless Congress passes it this year, President Obama on Thursday said to thousands of supporters in a phone call made from Air Force One, the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-28-obama-health_N.htm?csp=34" target="_new"><cite>AP/USA Today</cite></a> reports. In a call to members of his political organization, <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php" target="_new">Organizing for America</a>, Obama said, "If we don't get it done this year, we're not going to get it done," adding, "I think the status quo is unacceptable and that we've got to get it done this year." <BR><BR>Obama also said that any action on overhaul legislation could be delayed unless volunteers pressure lawmakers to support the administration's goals for health care reform (<cite>AP/USA Today</cite>, 5/28). Obama said, "Some of you are in states and districts where politicians are resistant to bringing about change, so we need you to get involved" (Zeleny, "<a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/from-the-air-obama-lobbies-supporters-on-health-care/" target="_new">The Caucus</a>," <cite>New York Times</cite>, 5/28). Obama told volunteers that it was time to "remobilize" after their successful campaign to get him elected, adding that "we have gotten a lot of things done during our first four months. But health care, that's a big push" (<cite>AP/USA Today</cite>, 5/28).<BR><BR>David Plouffe, Obama's presidential campaign manager and head of Organizing for America, during the call said, "If the country stands with the president and if the country is demanding health care reform, [then] we'll get it done," adding, "Washington will not have any option but to follow us." He added, "You need to take ownership of this" ("The Caucus," <cite>New York Times</cite>, 5/28).
<p><b>
Organizing for America Campaign
</b><br>
The conference call was in preparation for the launch of Organizing for America's health care campaign, the <cite>AP/USA Today</cite> reports (<cite>AP/USA Today</cite>, 5/28). Organizing for America has scheduled grassroots organizing events beginning June 6, when Obama will release a video message about his principal goals for reform. The ideas generated at the events will be used to plan public service events that will be held on June 27. Mitch Stewart, executive director of Organizing for America, said, "Reforming [our] health care system is going to require each and every one [of] us to get involved" (Davis, "<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/05/28/obama-asks-volunteers-for-campaign-push-on-health-care/" target="_new">Washington Wire</a>," <cite>Wall Street Journal</cite>, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Data Ranks Insurers According to Speed of Claim Payment, Share of Denials]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58641</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.aetna.com/index.htm" target="_new">Aetna</a>, <a href="http://www.cigna.com/" target="_new">Cigna</a> and <a href="http://www.humana.com/" target="_new">Humana</a> ranked highest nationally on criteria including speed of health claim payments and fewest claims denied, according to the 2009 PayerView Rankings, the <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2009/05/28/insurers_ranked_on_payment_records/" target="_new"><cite>Boston Globe</cite></a> reports. The rankings -- prepared by <a href="http://www.athenahealth.com/" target="_new">Athenahealth</a> in collaboration with <cite>Physicians Practice</cite> management journal -- evaluated 172 national, regional and government payers in 40 states.<BR><BR>According to the data, insurers paid physicians an average 5.3% faster in 2008 and denied an average of 9% fewer medical claims compared with 2007 figures. On average, national health insurers paid physicians in 33 days and denied 9.2% of claims.<BR><BR>According to the <cite>Globe</cite>, the rankings reveal some of the obstacles that can result from the complexities and bureaucracy involved in the medical billing process, with each insurer operating in different ways. Jonathan Bush, chair and CEO of Athenahealth, said, "This is the biggest problem we have in health care -- the inability to close supply chains and to practically and tactically connect doctors with payers and patients," adding, "These connections are broken" (Weisman, <cite>Boston Globe</cite>, 5/28). <BR><BR><img src="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/images/paper_icon.gif" width="12" height="15" alt="Online"> The rankings are available <a href="http://www.athenahealth.com/our-services/PayerView.php" target="_new">online</a>. ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Massachusetts, Tennessee Health Plans Might Offer Ideas on U.S. Health Care System Overhaul]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58642</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Congressional lawmakers who are crafting a plan to overhaul the U.S. health care system might be able to look to state health insurance programs in Massachusetts and Tennessee for ideas, the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/46424747.html" target="_new">AP/Minneapolis <cite>Star Tribune</cite></a> reports. <BR><BR>Health reform legislation modeled after Massachusetts' near-universal health insurance law "is likely to emerge" in Congress, "although details remain unsettled," the <cite>AP/Star</cite> <cite>Tribune</cite> reports. The plan also could include components of Tennessee's <a href="http://www.covertn.gov/" target="_new">CoverTN</a> program, which charges beneficiaries who smoke or are overweight higher premiums. Lawmakers in the Senate already have <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=58543" target="_new">discussed</a> a lifestyle tax funding mechanism, such as taxes on alcohol and sugary beverages. According to <i>AP/Star Tribune</i>, Massachusetts "chose to cover virtually everyone," while Tennessee "chose to get just a few more people bare-bones insurance at a budget price with limits on how much plans would pay for hospital stays."<BR><BR>Alan Weil of the <a href="http://www.nashp.org/" target="_new">National Academy for State Health Policy</a> said, "The belief that we should all have health insurance coverage is broadly held," but "there are tremendous differences around the country in beliefs on how to achieve that goal." He added, "We learn from Massachusetts that a bold objective matters. If it can be sustained, that's terrific," and "[i]t would be nice if you had a southern state that had achieved universal coverage and did it in a different way, but we don't have that" (Johnson, AP/Minneapolis <cite>Star Tribune</cite>, 5/28).<BR><BR><img src="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/images/videosettings/audioicon.gif"> American Public Media's "<a href="http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/05/28/pm_massachusetts/" target="_new">Marketplace</a>" on Thursday reported on a <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58630" target="_new">study</a> published in <i>Health Affairs</i> that looked at the Massachusetts program. The segment included comments from Jon Kingsdale, director of the Massachusetts Health Insurance Connector Authority, and <a href="http://www.unchealthcare.org/site" target="_new">University of North Carolina Health Care System</a> CEO Bill Roper (Babin, "Marketplace," American Public Media, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Texas Senate Passes CHIP Expansion Bill, Avoiding Legislative Backlog, Deadlines]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58643</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The Texas Senate on Wednesday voted to approve a bill that would boost enrollment in the state's version of CHIP, the <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/health/6444524.html" target="_new"><cite>Houston Chronicle</cite></a> reports. The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Kip Averitt (R), would raise the income eligibility threshold for the program to 200% of the federal poverty level for a family of four. Families' premiums, copayments and fees would not exceed 5% of their net income, under the bill (Elliott, <cite>Houston Chronicle</cite>, 5/28).<BR><BR>Supporters of the bill say that it could extend CHIP coverage to as many as 80,000 uninsured children statewide (<a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/448/story/1399576.html" target="_new"><cite>AP/Fort Worth Star-Telegram</cite></a>, 5/28). The bill now moves back to the state House for approval. The House approved legislation last month that would have expanded CHIP to families with annual incomes up to $88,000. Averitt said the measure, which he attached to a House bill on disease screening for newborns, is similar to a bill that passed the Senate in March.<BR><BR>According to the <cite>Chronicle</cite>, the state budget being finalized this week includes $43 million to expand CHIP, which would draw down federal matching funds (<cite>Houston Chronicle</cite>, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Nevada Assembly Passes Bill To Protect Physicians on J-1 Visas]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58644</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The Nevada Assembly last week voted to approve a bill (<a href="http://www.leg.state.nv.us/75th2009/Reports/history.cfm?ID=633" target="_new">SB 229</a>) that would authorize the Nevada <a href="http://health.nv.gov/" target="_new">Department of Health and Human Services</a> to stop the exploitation of foreign physicians who have come to the state to provide care to residents in underserved areas, the <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/may/28/legislators-get-tough-abuse-foreign-doctor-program/" target="_new"><cite>Las Vegas Sun</cite></a> reports. The measure now goes to Gov. Jim Gibbons (R) for his approval (Allen, <cite>Las Vegas Sun</cite>, 5/28). <BR><BR>A September 2007 <cite>Sun</cite> investigation of the J-1 visa program found that some foreign physicians were forced by their sponsors to work up to 100 hours per week, and were being "cheated out of their salaries" and "diverted from the patients" in underserved areas whom they were supposed to help (<a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=53776" target="_new"><cite>Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report</cite></a>, 8/6/08).<BR><BR>The legislation would make violations of the J-1 program more clearly punishable under state law and prosecutable by the attorney general's office; charge J-1 physician sponsors a fee to cover the cost of enforcing the law; and protect whistle-blowers (<cite>Las Vegas Sun</cite>, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[<cite>Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report</cite> Feature Highlights Recent Blog Entries]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58645</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ "Blog Watch" offers readers a roundup of health policy-related blog posts.<BR><BR>Bloggers are tentatively reacting to a <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10243/HealthInsuranceProposals.htm" target="_new">report</a> and <a href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=280" target="_new">blog post</a> released by the Congressional Budget Office that summarizes the agency's approach to estimating the cost of any health overhaul bills. At issue is how CBO will count different stipulations of legislation -- like an individual mandate or a public plan -- and whether their conclusions will result in a heftier price tag.  Douglas Elmendorf explained on the <a href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=280" target="_new">Director's Blog</a>: <BR> <BR>"In CBO's view, the key consideration is whether a proposal would be making health insurance an essentially governmental program, tightly controlled by the federal government with little choice available to those who offer and buy health insurance -- or whether the system would provide significant flexibility in terms of the types, prices, and number of private-sector sellers of insurance available to people. The former -- a governmental program -- belongs in the federal budget (including all premiums paid by individuals and firms to private insurers), but the latter -- a largely private-sector system -- does not." <BR> <BR>Janet Adamy of the <cite>Wall Street Journal</cite>'s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/05/27/cbo-health-overhaul-would-alter-federal-budget/" target="_new">Washington Wire</a> notes that the report doesn't address the cost estimates of the scenarios.  Alan Katz on his <a href="http://alankatz.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/cbo-light-regulation-of-private-market-reduces-budget-impact/" target="_new">Health Care Reform Blog</a> concludes, "the message is clear: the looser government's hand grips the new health care system the smaller its budgetary impact."  <BR> <BR>Liberal bloggers had a variety of reactions -- some found the report too vague, while others saw it as good news. The <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_treatment/archive/2009/05/28/cbo-has-spoken-somebody-get-me-a-talmudic-scholar.aspx" target="_new"><cite>New Republic</cite></a>'s Jonathan Cohn says, "you may need a Talmudic scholar to figure out what those implications are." Cohn continues, "Other passages in the briefing are [similarly] vexing and, for what it's worth, the reactions I've gotten from insiders familiar with the report have ranged from sighs of relief to statements not suitable for a family blog."<BR> <BR><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/05/cbo_decides_against_crazy_ruli.html" target="_new">Ezra Klein</a> agrees the report lacks specificity, but says, "Even so, I'm cheered by the simple existence of this ruling. The fact that CBO is explaining its thinking before legislation arrives [is] yet more evidence that CBO appears, insofar as it can, to be trying to help out on health reform. ... That's an important change from past years." <BR> <BR>Interesting Elsewhere: <BR><ul><li class="AdvisoryBullet"><a href="http://tinkerready.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/health-wonk-review-bosstown-edition/" target="_new">Boston Health News</a>' Tinker Ready hosts the latest edition of <a href="http://www.healthwonkreview.com/mt/" target="_new">Health Wonk Review</a>, a biweekly compendium of more than two dozen health policy, infrastructure, insurance, technology and managed care bloggers. A different participant's blog hosts each issue; <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Jacob Goldstein of the <cite>Wall Street Journal</cite>'s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/05/27/supremes-will-hear-merck-appeal-in-vioxx-shareholder-lawsuit/" target="_new">Health Blog</a> reports that the Supreme Court will hear Merck's appeal to a ruling over whether the pharmaceutical company misled shareholders on the safety data of the arthritis drug Vioxx;  <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/28/public-health-care-plan-g_n_208679.html" target="_new">Huffington Post</a>'s Sam Stein reports that Sen. Max Baucus' (D-Mont.) chief of staff said Baucus is "fighting tooth and nail to include [a public plan option] in any final deal";  <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">The<cite> National Journal</cite>'s <a href="http://healthcare.nationaljournal.com/2009/05/selling-health-reform-the-mess.php" target="_new">Marilyn Werber Serafini</a> solicits her experts' opinions: "When it comes to forming a winning message for health care reform, how should Democrats and Republicans in Congress (and President Obama) talk about it, and what should they absolutely stay away from? What messages will go over well with the public, and what could kill health reform?" Responders include Drew Altman, Karen Davis, C. Eugene Steuerle, Uwe Reinhardt, John Goodman and David Kendall; <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Uwe Reinhardt on the <cite>New York Times</cite>' <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/is-employer-based-health-insurance-worth-saving/" target="_new">Economix</a> looks at the origin of employer-sponsored health insurance in the U.S.;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Michael Miller of the <a href="http://www.healthpolcom.com/blog/2009/05/27/health-reforms-line-in-the-sand/" target="_new">Health Policy and Communications</a> blog looks at a new <cite>National Journal</cite> "Insider's Poll" that asks experts, "What is your view of including a new public insurance plan in health care reform?"<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">James Capretta of <a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/blog/diagnosis/not-obamacare" target="_new">Diagnosis</a> says the <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=58542" target="_new">Patients' Choice Act</a> "has been well-received among conservatives ... for good reason," although he disagrees with some liberal bloggers that the plan's structure is a sign that a Democratic plan's passage is "more likely";  <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet"><a href="http://healthpolicyandmarket.blogspot.com/2009/05/when-we-really-do-health-care-reform.html" target="_new">Bob Laszewski</a>, referring to a <i>New Yorker</i> <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all" target="_new">article</a> by Atul Gawande on controlling health costs that profiles a Texas town, concludes, "When we have a health care bill that starts to change things in McAllen, Texas, then it will be worthy of the label, health care reform";<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Ray Ranthum on <a href="http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/attack-on-hsas/" target="_new">John Goodman's Health Policy Blog</a> says the Senate Finance Committee "has proposed new changes to health savings accounts that could make them less attractive in the future."</li></ul> ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Editorials Discuss Reform, Taxation of Health Benefits]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58646</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ <ul><li class="AdvisoryBullet"><a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/05/on-health-care-republicans-move-beyond-just-say-no.html" target="_new"><cite>USA Today</cite></a>: It is "gratifying" that Republicans last week <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=58542" target="_new">introduced</a> a health care proposal because "the simple fact that it exists might improve chances" for bipartisan negotiations, a <cite>USA Today</cite> editorial states. According to the editorial, the plan -- which would replace the current tax exemption of employer-provided insurance with a refundable tax credit for all families and individuals, regardless of their employment status -- is "no cure-all," but is a "serious proposal that merits serious consideration." The editorial states, "For all those who say the Republican Party is out of ideas, on the issue of health coverage, at least, its proposal is bolder than what the Democrats have offered." However, the editorial notes that both Republicans and Democrats "have identified more groundbreaking ideas, and they are not entirely incompatible." The editorial concludes, "[L]et the debate begin. The only unacceptable approach is the status quo" (<cite>USA Today</cite>, 5/29).<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124355286037664421.html" target="_new"><cite>Wall Street Journal</cite></a>: The "emerging 180-degree turn by Democrats on taxes and health insurance is one for the record books," a <cite>Journal</cite> editorial states. According to the editorial, "Democrats have spent years arguing that proposals to equalize the tax treatment of health insurance are an outrage against the American people." However, "now Democrats need the money to finance $1.2 trillion or more for their new health insurance entitlement" and are considering taxing health insurance, according to the editorial. The editorial continues, "Democrats owe an apology" to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who favored taxing health benefits during his campaign and was "mauled" by liberals who criticized the idea as a tax hike on the middle class in "brutal" television ads. The editorial states, "Having told the country that this tax reform is really a tax increase, Democrats are opening themselves to the same attacks they leveled against Republicans." The editorial concludes that the only way Democrats can pay for their goal of "government-run health care" is "by taxing everything in sight, including your current health insurance" (<cite>Wall Street Journal</cite>, 5/29).</li></ul> ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Issue Brief Examines Social Security COLA, Medicare Part B Premium]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58647</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ "<a href="http://kff.org/medicare/7912.cfm" target="_new">The Social Security COLA and Medicare Part B Premium: Questions, Answers and Issues</a>," <a href="http://www.kff.org/" target="_new">Kaiser Family Foundation</a> <a href="http://www.kff.org/about/medicare.cfm" target="_new">Medicare Policy Project</a>: The issue brief examines how Social Security recipients for the first time in 2010 are not expected to receive a cost-of-living adjustment, with no or a low COLA expected through 2012. The brief examines the relationship between the Social Security COLA and the Medicare Part B premium and the effect that such changes have on beneficiaries of both programs (Kaiser Family Foundation release, 5/27). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Study Estimates Cost Added to Private Health Insurance Premiums To Cover Uncompensated Care]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58623</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The average U.S. family and their employers paid an additional $1,017 in health care premiums in 2008 to pay for care of the uninsured, according to a study released on Thursday by <a href="http://www.familiesusa.org/" target="_new">Families USA</a>, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/insurance/2009-05-28-hiddentax_N.htm" target="_new"><cite>USA Today</cite></a> reports (Kim, <cite>USA Today</cite>, 5/28). According to the study, which examined federal data, the uninsured received $116 billion in health care from hospitals, physicians and other providers in 2008 and paid 37% of that amount. Government programs and charities covered an additional 26%, which left another 37%, or about $43 billion, unpaid. The study then estimated how those costs are when spread across the insured through higher premiums, the study found. According to the study, prepared by the actuarial firm Milliman, the average additional amount paid under private coverage for single individuals was about $370 per year (Werner, <a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/shared-gen/ap/National/US_Health_Overhaul_Uninsured.html" target="_new"><cite>AP/Austin American-Statesman</cite></a>, 5/28). Families USA Executive Director Ron Pollack said, "This is a hidden tax on all insurance premiums, whether it is paid by business for their work or by families when they purchase their own coverage" (<cite>USA Today</cite>, 5/28).<BR><BR>The study is available <a href="http://www.familiesusa.org/resources/publications/reports/hidden-health-tax.html" target="_new">online</a>. ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[UnitedHealth Group Offers 15 Recommendations To Reduce Federal Health Spending by $540B Over 10 Years]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58624</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/main/default.aspx" target="_new">UnitedHealth Group</a>'s Center for Health Reform and Modernization on Wednesday suggested 15 steps that could be taken to save $540 billion in federal in health care costs over the next 10 years, the <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/health/1500ap_us_health_overhaul_insurers.html" target="_new"><cite>AP/Seattle Post-Intelligencer</cite></a><cite> </cite>reports (Werner, <cite>AP/Seattle Post-Intelligencer</cite>, 5/27). Simon Stevens, head of the center, said that the report "puts some flesh on the bones" of the <a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=58419" target="_new">pledge</a> made by health care industry groups earlier this month to cut health care costs, noting that the recommendations already are being used by UnitedHealth to reduce costs and can be applied to Medicare (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE54Q5EQ20090527" target="_new"><cite>Reuters</cite></a>, 5/27).<BR><BR>The recommended steps include: <BR><ul><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Providing patients with incentives for going to high-quality, efficient physicians;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Reducing unnecessary care;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Granting physicians incentives for providing comprehensive and preventive care;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Providing nurse practitioners at nursing homes to manage illness and reduce avoidable hospitalizations to save $166 billion;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Using evidence-based care management with preventive care to reduce avoidable hospitalizations and save $102 billion;<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Analyzing claims before they are paid to prevent duplicate billing and other administrative errors to save $57 billion (<cite>CongressDaily</cite>, 5/27); and<BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Reducing the use of advanced imaging technologies to save $13 billion (<cite>AP/Seattle Post-Intelligencer</cite>, 5/27).</li></ul>"We are issuing (the recommendations) as a constructive contribution to the debate on how national health reform can proceed," Stevens said. He added, "What we know is there is a huge variation in cost and quality across the health care system," and the proposed steps are "some of the practical techniques that help us get a grip on that" (Diaz, <a href="http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/46240177.html?elr=KArksUUUU" target="_new">Minneapolis <cite>Star Tribune</cite></a>, 5/27). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[CBO Report Details Budgetary Treatment of Health Reform]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58625</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ A mandate requiring all U.S. residents to purchase health coverage would not be considered a new form of federal taxation as long as people could choose from a wide variety of private plans and no government entity was responsible for collecting their premiums, according to a <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/" target="_new">Congressional Budget Office</a> report released on Wednesday, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/27/AR2009052703350.html" target="_new"><cite>Washington Post</cite></a><cite> </cite>reports.  <BR><BR>CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf in his <a href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/" target="_new">blog</a> wrote, "In CBO's view, the key consideration is whether a proposal would be making health insurance an essentially governmental program, tightly controlled by the federal government, ... or whether the system would provide significant flexibility in terms of the types, prices and number of private-sector sellers of insurance available to people." He continued, "The former -- a governmental program -- belongs in the federal budget (including all premiums paid by individuals and firms to private insurers), but the latter -- a largely private-sector system -- does not." <BR><BR>Elmendorf wrote, "Premium income -- for a public plan (or plans) and for insurance purchased through exchanges or in the private market -- should be classified as federal revenues if there is an individual mandate and tight government control of the insurance market." However, income from premiums should not appear in the federal budget "if there is no mandate and no public plan, or there is an individual mandate and an active, loosely restricted private market, and if premiums are paid through nongovernmental exchanges or directly to insurers."<BR><BR>CBO in 1994, when lawmakers were considering the Clinton administration's health reform proposal, concluded that a proposed requirement that employers and employees make payments into government-run insurance pools would constitute a form of taxation and a major expansion of the federal government (Montgomery, <cite>Washington Post</cite>, 5/28). <BR><BR><img src="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/images/paper_icon.gif" width="12" height="15" alt="Online"> The CBO report is available <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=10243" target="_new">online</a>. ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Advertising From Interest Groups Ramps Up as Lawmakers Return to Congress To Work on Health Reform]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58626</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Advertisements from interest groups on health reform have increased in recent days, as the congressional session resumes next week and lawmakers continue to work on reform legislation, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/health/policy/28health.html?ref=politics" target="_new"><cite>New York Times</cite></a> reports. Spots from <a href="http://www.healthcareforamericanow.org/" target="_new">Health Care for America Now</a> advocate coverage for all U.S. residents and a public health insurance option. One of the group's ads is airing in Maine and urges viewers to contact Sens. Olympia Snowe (R) and Susan Collins (R) to express support for the public insurance option. The group has spent $200,000 on ads in the last month, according to spokesperson Jacki Schechner. <BR><BR>Business Forward -- a new coalition that includes <a href="http://www.att.com/" target="_new">AT&T</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/" target="_new">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.ibm.com/" target="_new">IBM</a> -- is running ads to encourage business executives to work with the Obama administration and congressional lawmakers in "reforming health care" (Pear, <cite>New York Times</cite>, 5/28). Also, <a href="http://healthyeconomynow.org/" target="_new">Healthy Economy Now</a> has an ad campaign to support reform efforts (Dann, <cite>CongressDaily</cite>, 5/27).<BR><BR><a href="http://www.conservativesforpatientsrights.com/" target="_new">Conservatives for Patients' Rights</a>, a group founded by former <a href="http://www.hcahealthcare.com/" target="_new">Hospital Corporation of America</a> CEO Richard Scott, has been airing a 30-minute video on cable networks showing British and Canadian doctors and patients who are not satisfied with their respective countries' health systems. The group is spending $1.2 million on the video and a campaign of short TV spots and earlier this year spent $2.5 million on similar ads, according to spokesperson Keith Appell. <BR><BR>The <a href="http://www.americansforprosperity.org/" target="_new">Americans for Prosperity Foundation</a> has spent $800,000 on television ads in eight states. In its spot, a woman from Canada describes her experience with the Canadian health system and how she ended up receiving treatment in the U.S. According to the <cite>Times</cite>, similar campaigns "helped sink President Clinton's plan for universal coverage 15 years ago" (<cite>New York Times</cite>, 5/28). ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[<cite>Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report </cite>Highlights Recent Health Reform Developments]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58627</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Summaries of recent developments related to health care overhaul appear below.<BR><ul><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Howard Dean: Former <a href="http://www.democrats.org/" target="_new">Democratic National Committee</a> Chair and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean (D) on Wednesday discussed Democrats' proposal to establish a public, government-run health insurance option that would compete with private insurers, the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_12464338" target="_new"><cite>Denver Post</cite></a> reports. At a rally in Denver -- one of his many stops in a nationwide tour to discuss health care reform -- Dean said that the public insurance option is "not a poor people's program," adding, "This needs to be an everybody program. Let's have real choice" (Brown, <cite>Denver Post</cite>, 5/28). <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Businesses: The <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/05/28/business_warms_to_democratic_leaders/" target="_new"><cite>Boston Globe</cite></a> on Thursday examined how business leaders are working with examined how business leaders are working with congressional Democrats on a variety of issues, including health care reform. Drew Altman, president and CEO of the <a href="http://www.kff.org/" target="_new">Kaiser Family Foundation</a>, said, "I think there's a desperation now on the part of business for government to bail them out when it comes to health care costs," adding, "They've thrown their ideological opposition to government health care out the window because they need help with costs" (Milligan, <cite>Boston Globe</cite>, 5/28).  <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Prospects: <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/05/26/new_optimism_on_us_healthcare_but_obstacles_remain/" target="_new"><cite>Reuters/Globe</cite></a> reports that "The U.S. Congress has started work on a broad overhaul of the healthcare system in a rare spirit of optimism, but brewing battles over its cost, scope and structure could still scuttle hopes for a solution" (Whitesides, <cite>Reuters/Boston Globe</cite>, 5/28). <BR><BR></li><li class="AdvisoryBullet">Public plan: American Public Media's "<a href="http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/05/28/am_health_care_reform/" target="_new">Marketplace Morning Report</a>" on Thursday reported on uncertainties about how a public health insurance option would work and how much it would cost (Henn, "Marketplace Morning Report," American Public Media, 5/28).<BR></li></ul> ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>

 <item>
  <title><![CDATA[Many U.S. Hospitals Fail To Report Physician Disciplinary Cases to National Databank]]></title>
  <link>http://kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=58628</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Many U.S. hospitals do not take sufficient disciplinary action against physicians for poor conduct or medical incompetence and fail to report such cases to the <a href="http://www.npdb-hipdb.com/" target="_new">National Practitioner Data Bank</a>, according to a report released Wednesday by <a href="http://www.citizen.org/" target="_new">Public Citizen</a>, the <a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_12462642" target="_new"><cite>Contra Costa Times</cite></a> reports. Congress established the databank in 1990 as a central repository for information about physicians whose hospital privileges had been withdrawn or limited for more than 30 days. The bank is closed to the public (Kleffman, <i>Contra Costa Times</i>, 5/27).<BR><BR>For the report, Public Citizen's <a href="http://www.citizen.org/hrg/" target="_new">Health Research Group</a> analyzed studies by the <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/" target="_new">HHS</a> <a href="http://www.oig.hhs.gov/" target="_new">Office of Inspector General</a> and the <a href="http://www.citizenadvocacycenter.org/" target="_new">Citizen Advocacy Center</a>, as well as medical journal articles and recommendations made during an October 1996 meeting on under-reporting by hospitals (Stark/Hallihan, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=7686614&page=1" target="_new">ABCNews.com</a>, 5/27). According to the report, nearly half of U.S. hospitals did not submit one physician's name in 17 years to the databank. One purpose of the databank is to provide hospitals with background information about physicians they were considering hiring at their facilities. Under the initial expectations of the databank, federal officials estimated that at least 5,000 disciplinary cases would be reported annually. However, on average, about 650 reports have been made annually since the databank was created, the report found (<cite>Contra Costa Times</cite>, 5/27). <BR><BR>The group on Wednesday sent a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that included recommendations to improve the efficacy of the databank. The letter said that the reporting numbers are "unreasonably low, compared with what would be expected if hospitals pursued disciplinary actions aggressively and reported all such actions." The letter urged Sebelius to ensure that hospitals are conducting necessary peer reviews and oversight of physicians, taking proper disciplinary actions and reporting them to the databank so that physicians' track records are available to all hospital administrators. Penalties also should be established for hospitals that fail to comply with the reporting requirements, the group said.<BR><BR>Al Levine, the author of the report, said some hospitals had found ways to avoid their physician reporting responsibilities, such as by limiting restrictions on hospital privileges to fewer than 30 days or giving physicians a "leave of absence" in place of suspending their privileges. Levine said, "Even in states with high levels of reporting," it "seems to be concentrated in a few facilities" (<cite>Contra Costa Times</cite>, 5/27).<BR><BR>In a statement responding to the report, the <a href="http://www.aha.org/" target="_new">American Hospital Association</a> said, "The premise that the number of reports received by the National Practitioner Data Bank correlates to jeopardized patient care is inaccurate," adding, "Hospitals are actively involved in a wide variety of efforts to continuously improve care and talk publicly about the care we provide" (ABCNews.com, 5/27).<BR><BR><img src="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/images/paper_icon.gif" width="12" height="15" alt="Online"> The report is available <a href="http://www.citizen.org/publications/release.cfm?ID=7659" target="_new">online</a>. ]]></description>
  <category>Daily Health Policy Report</category>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 </item>


</channel>
</rss>
